Philosophical Reflections on Imaginary Creatures: Loch Ness
Written on
Chapter 1: The Enigma of Nessie
When it comes to discussing animals, it seems there are no restrictions on using fantastical creatures. Unlike the previously mentioned real animals in this series, the Loch Ness Monster, endearingly referred to as Nessie, likely doesn't exist at all. If it were real, it would be ancient and extraordinarily adept at evading detection. Alternatively, it’s possible there are multiple Nessies, all skilled at remaining unseen.
The earliest recorded modern sighting dates back to either 1871 or 1872, when D. Mackenzie from Balnain reported observing something resembling a log that stirred the water. Initially moving slowly, it accelerated rapidly before disappearing.
However, this wasn't the first instance of such a sighting. In the sixth century AD, Adomnán, who was the abbot of Iona Abbey, chronicled the life of Saint Columba—an Irish monk who traversed the Pictish territories. During his journey, Columba encountered the burial site of a man who had been attacked by a water creature in the River Ness.
Could it be that Nessie is over 1,500 years old, or are there numerous Nessies that skillfully avoid detection? Loch Ness itself is vast and notoriously murky, covering an area of 56 square kilometers with a maximum depth of 230 meters. While it seems spacious enough, a genetically viable population would require more than just a couple of creatures, even if they are prehistoric in nature.
In the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, many expeditions aimed to solve the Loch Ness mystery. However, most discoveries yielded ambiguous photographs or questionable sonar readings. If you're curious, you can explore the area via Google Earth's Mysteries of Loch Ness. Additionally, typing "Loch Ness" into Google Maps won't lead you to street view but instead reveals a small depiction of Nessie.
Numerous theories have emerged, with some of the most popular suggesting everything from plesiosaurs to giant newts or a yet-to-be-identified species of sea turtle. In 2018, a collaborative team from the universities of Otago, Copenhagen, Hull, and the Highlands and Islands conducted an environmental DNA (eDNA) survey. This method involves collecting soil samples and analyzing them for DNA traces, as animals continuously shed DNA through skin, mucus, and waste.
The findings? No signs of reptilian DNA, nor were there traces of otters, seals, sharks, catfish, or sturgeons. However, a significant amount of eel DNA was detected. Could it be that Nessie is merely a gigantic eel?
Why delve into the existence of a (likely) fictional creature from a philosophical standpoint?
Section 1.1: The Philosophical Significance of Thought Experiments
Thought experiments—by their very nature imaginary—have a storied legacy in both philosophy and science. However, Nessie transcends the boundaries of a typical thought experiment. She prompts us to engage with fundamental questions in the philosophy of science and epistemology, which concerns the nature and scope of knowledge. What constitutes valid evidence? How much evidence is necessary to accept or reject a hypothesis? If a lack of evidence does not equate to evidence of absence, why shouldn't we entertain the belief in Nessie?
Occam's razor suggests we should favor simpler explanations. But if Nessie is elusive, does she escape such scrutiny?
In essence, what defines falsification, and what standards must hypotheses and evidence meet to be accepted, especially when we cannot test every conceivable alternative?
Section 1.2: Real-World Implications of Belief
If these inquiries seem abstract and disconnected from reality, consider their relevance to contemporary issues such as the tendency of some individuals to believe in conspiracy theories. Why do certain people cling to beliefs when all available evidence contradicts them? This is not just an intellectual exercise; it can have serious consequences. Think of the risks posed by anti-vaccination movements, dangerous cults, or even leaders who promote harmful practices.
In light of this, perhaps we should pay more attention to the lessons from Nessie.
Chapter 2: Exploring the Mysteries of Loch Ness
This first video, titled "The Loch Ness Monster: A Skeptical Look," explores the myths and realities surrounding this enigmatic creature through a skeptical lens.
In the second video, "The Loch Ness Monster with John Horrigan," the discussion delves into various theories and stories about Nessie, providing further insight into this intriguing phenomenon.
Recommended Reading:
- Daniel Loxton & Donald Prothero (2013). Abominable Science! Origins of the Yeti, Nessie, and Other Famous Cryptids. Columbia University Press.
- Katja Jyllka (2018). “Witness the Plesiosaurus”: Geological Traces and the Loch Ness Monster Narrative. Configurations 26(2): 207–234.
- Artūrs Logins (2018). Why won’t scientific evidence change the minds of Loch Ness monster true believers? The Conversation.
- Darren Naish (2019). Loch Ness Monster: how eDNA helps us discover what lurks beneath. BBC Science Focus.