# The Dichotomy of Space: Newton's Certainty and Einstein's Relativity
Written on
Chapter 1: Absolute Space and Its Implications
In the novel Smilla's Sense of Snow, the protagonist, Smilla Jaspersen, reflects on the concept of Absolute Space, referring to it as “that which we can cling to.” This notion stems from her deep understanding of navigation, which she honed while growing up in Greenland. Smilla's innate directional sense allowed her to traverse the treacherous Arctic landscape without relying on instruments, a skill that proved invaluable during her hunting excursions.
Smilla’s perspective is contrasted by Albert Einstein's theory of relativity, which challenges the very idea of a fixed, absolute space. She expresses a steadfast belief in Newton's principles, asserting, “No one is going to find his way home to Qaanaaq with his nose stuck in Einstein’s writings.” This dichotomy reflects a broader human need for a stable foundation from which to understand our surroundings.
“This concept resonates deeply with the human experience: a longing for solid ground to stand upon.”
Section 1.1: The Allure of Metaphor
As an English major and writer, I often find myself interpreting complex ideas through metaphor. While metaphors can enhance understanding, they can also oversimplify intricate concepts. The discussion of Absolute versus Relative Space is crucial within physics, and it’s essential that we approach it with care rather than reducing it to mere metaphorical expressions.
Section 1.2: The Fragility of Perception
As children, we tend to perceive the world as a flat, stable surface, with the sun moving across the sky. However, as we grow, we learn that the Earth is a rotating sphere, and our understanding of the universe begins to unravel. This realization extends to the moon's orbit and ultimately to the movement of our entire solar system. Thus, our early notions of Absolute Space start to lose their clarity.
Chapter 2: The Challenge of Relative Truth
In our quest for understanding, we often cling to the belief in Absolute Space, hoping that it provides a moral compass as well. However, the reality of Relative Space complicates this belief. As I delved into the Wikipedia entry on Absolute Space, I found the concept of a "preferred frame" particularly enlightening. This simplifies complex ideas in physics but raises questions about the nature of truth itself.
The absence of Absolute Space raises unsettling implications: if no such stable framework exists, can we truly claim any Absolute Truth? As someone who leans towards liberal ideologies, I find it difficult to reconcile my beliefs with those of others who hold opposing views. Each side believes firmly in their moral standing, leading to a profound question: How can we know when we are wrong?
In historical contexts, one's beliefs were often shaped by the surrounding culture—whether it was the worship of Norse gods in pre-modern Scandinavia or the veneration of Greek deities in ancient times. Today, in a vastly different landscape, we must consider whether our beliefs are as immutable as our eye color.
Section 2.1: The Influence of Perspective
Neil DeGrasse Tyson encapsulates this dilemma in a powerful statement from Cosmos: “Always remember: You could be wrong.” This echoes the essence of relative thinking. Without a foundation of absolutes, the pursuit of knowledge becomes a precarious endeavor.
Smilla herself grapples with this complexity when she acknowledges the limitations of Newton's theories, stating, “All we did was prove that Newton’s arguments were inadequate.” Her acknowledgment hints at the subjective nature of belief and the powerful pull of personal experience in shaping our convictions.
Ultimately, the concept of Absolute Space may serve as a reminder that our demographics do not dictate our destinies. The first step in this journey of understanding is to recognize the ground beneath us—be it ancient Greece, rural Alabama, or urban Los Angeles—and evaluate the perspectives that shape our views.
Choose your ground wisely.