Understanding Ultra-Processed Foods: Debunking the Myths
Written on
Chapter 1: The Confusion Surrounding Food Labels
Consumer confusion regarding food classifications is evident. For instance, while 60% of people identify raw eggs as unprocessed, a significant 40% do not. Similarly, 60% view energy drinks as ultra-processed, yet 40% disagree. This discrepancy suggests a misunderstanding of food processing—many believe that a hen’s activity constitutes food processing, while the operations of a cola factory do not.
This irony is highlighted in a recent report by the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT). The document reveals a staggering truth: most individuals are wary of ultra-processed foods (UPFs), yet there is a lack of understanding about what they truly are. Even if they were informed, many would not change their eating habits.
In the sections that follow, we will delve into (1) the shared ignorance among consumers and scientists alike regarding UPFs, (2) the limited scientific backing connecting UPFs to adverse health effects, and (3) my personal approach as a public health scientist to minimize the term UPF in my discussions.
We'll start by addressing two fundamental questions: What exactly are UPFs? And how harmful are they really? The unexpected answer to both is that, quite frankly, "nobody really knows."
Section 1.1: Defining Ultra-Processed Foods
In 2009, the need for a clearer food labeling system became apparent. The existing frameworks—Health Star Rating, Multiple Traffic Lights, Nutri-Score, Reference Intakes, and Warning Label systems—had not sufficiently clarified the confusion among consumers. Brazilian scientist Carlos Augusto Monteiro responded by creating the NOVA classification, which categorizes foods into four groups: unprocessed, processed, ultra-processed, and culinary ingredients.
When implementing any rating system, consistency is crucial, especially for epidemiologists studying the health implications of UPF consumption. A group of researchers in France sought to evaluate whether food and nutrition specialists reached consistent classifications using the NOVA system. They enlisted 159 evaluators to categorize 120 marketed foods and 177 evaluators for 111 generic foods, resulting in an extensive analysis of thousands of classifications.
The findings were telling: only three of the 120 marketed foods and just one of the 111 generic foods were unanimously assigned to the same NOVA category by all evaluators. Moreover, many foods were inconsistently categorized across multiple NOVA groups.
Section 1.2: Expert Opinions on Food Classification
The researchers also compared the NOVA system with the EU’s preferred Nutri-Score system. Notably, 26% of ultra-processed marketed foods were classified in Nutri-Score’s healthiest category. If nearly 200 experts cannot agree on food classifications, it’s unreasonable to expect everyday consumers to make informed choices about their diets.
Chapter 2: Are Ultra-Processed Foods Unhealthy?
Recently, a German research team conducted an umbrella review to assess the health implications of UPF consumption. An umbrella review synthesizes findings from multiple reviews to offer a clearer picture of benefits and risks associated with dietary interventions.
Upon reviewing the quality of the studies included, it was revealed that the majority (63%) of the 16 reviews were critically low in quality, with none rated as moderate or high. This raises questions about the reliability of the existing evidence on UPFs.
The researchers also evaluated the certainty of the evidence, finding only a handful of health conditions significantly correlated with UPF intake, such as colon cancer and type 2 diabetes, but with varying degrees of certainty.
In Summary
So, what purpose does the UPF label serve? It does little to enlighten consumers, who are already overwhelmed by conflicting dietary advice.
As a public health scientist, I recognize that highly processed foods are ubiquitous. Whether it’s a candy bar, fast food, or dessert, these items aren't exactly health foods. However, they don't inherently lead to poor health—if consumed wisely. Health is a balance, and lifestyle factors like physical activity play a critical role.
My approach involves maintaining a balanced diet during the week and indulging on weekends, which may include UPFs. Despite the classification of certain foods as ultra-processed, I won’t skip my beloved Bavarian beer and pretzel on weekends.
The French researchers’ conclusions resonate with me: while the concept of UPFs has gained traction, the NOVA criteria do not provide a definitive classification.
Bon Appetit!