Understanding Olbers' Paradox: Why the Night Sky Is Dark
Written on
Chapter 1: The Enigma of Darkness in the Night Sky
The Earth’s rotation creates the cycle of day and night. When one hemisphere faces the sun, it basks in daylight, while the other remains in darkness. At first glance, it might seem that the setting sun is the sole reason for nightfall, but the truth is far more complex.
Though we might think of the universe as potentially infinite, its immense size suggests that if it were indeed limitless, we should see a star in every direction we gaze. Our galaxy alone boasts over 200 billion stars, leading one to wonder why the night sky isn't ablaze with light, making day and night indistinguishable.
For centuries, scientists have sought an explanation for this phenomenon. The first significant hypothesis came from Thomas Digges, who after observing a supernova in 1572, theorized that stars are not uniformly distanced from us. He posited that brighter stars are likely closer, whereas fainter ones are more distant. This revolutionary idea challenged the previously accepted Copernican view. Digges speculated that if an infinite number of stars existed in infinite space, the question emerged: Why does night remain dark?
For Digges, the answer was straightforward: “The lights of distant stars are too dim to see.” However, Johannes Kepler had a different perspective in 1610, reasoning that the universe's infinity explained this paradox.
By the 18th century, astronomer Edmond Halley supported Digges’s claim, asserting the universe's infinity, while noting that distant stars were simply too faint to be observed. Swiss scientist Cheseaux countered this view by suggesting that a greater number of distant, dim stars could equal the brightness of fewer, closer stars.
In 1823, Heinrich Olbers introduced the notion that interstellar clouds of gas and dust absorb light from stars. What Olbers failed to recognize was that these clouds eventually emit their own light after some time. The answers to these questions awaited a new perspective on the nature of space and time, which would emerge in the 20th century.
Gravity and the Expansion of Space
In 1915, Albert Einstein published his general theory of relativity, providing a more nuanced understanding of gravity than Newton had offered. This theory also illustrated how gravity influences the fabric of space and time.
Shortly thereafter, physicists began applying relativity to explore the universe's characteristics. They soon concluded that in a finite and stable universe, gravity would inevitably lead to a contraction and eventual collapse.
To address this dilemma, Einstein introduced a term called “cosmic repulsive force” into his equations. However, Aleksandr Friedmann asserted that Einstein's cosmic repulsion concept was incorrect, proposing instead that the universe was in a state of expansion. Lacking experimental evidence, Friedmann's ideas were initially dismissed. A few years later, Edwin Hubble's observations lent credence to Friedmann’s theories.
Hubble not only confirmed the existence of galaxies beyond our Milky Way but also discovered that many galaxies were receding from us. These findings supported the notion of an expanding universe.
Once the model of an expanding universe was established, Hubble suggested that if the universe is indeed expanding, it must have previously been smaller. His hypothesis ultimately persuaded scientists that a significant event must have initiated the universe's birth—a concept later termed the Big Bang by Fred Hoyle in the 1950s.
The expanding universe model, which cosmologists now believe has been unfolding for 14 billion years, was significantly advanced by the revelation in 1998 that this expansion is accelerating, providing further insight into Olbers' Paradox.
Is the Darkness of Night Due to a Finite Universe?
As discussed, the darkness of night is not merely due to the universe being finite, nor is it solely because distant stars appear faint or light is absorbed by gas and dust clouds. The key to solving this paradox lies in the speed of light.
Light travels at a finite speed, establishing a cosmic speed limit that contributes to the night’s darkness. The night sky remains dark because the universe had a beginning.
To conclude, I would like to share two insightful quotes from Jim Al-Khalili’s book, Paradox:
“Since the Universe is about 14 billion years old, we can only see galaxies that are close to us whose light will reach us in 14 billion years. The expansion of space complicates things a bit. When we say galaxy 10 billion light-years away, we mean a galaxy whose light has traveled for 10 billion years. But since the space between us and the galaxy is stretched during this time, the distance is actually several times greater. It’s not much anyway, even if the distance is doubled, it’s out of our field of view because its light hasn’t reached us yet. Therefore, it does not contribute to the light of the night. We can only know about space to the extent that the age of the Universe permits.”
The second quote, from poet Edgar Allan Poe, states:
“Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present us a uniform luminosity, like that displayed by the Galaxy — since there could be absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star. The only mode, therefore, in which, under such a state of affairs, we could comprehend the voids, which our telescopes find in innumerable directions, would be by supporting the distance of the invisible background so immense that no ray from it has yet been able to reach us at all.”
References:
- Cosmos — Carl Sagan
- Paradox: The Nine Greatest Enigmas in Physics — Jim Al-Khalili
In the first video, "Why Is The Night Sky So Dark? Olbers' Paradox Explained," the concept of Olbers’ Paradox is further explored, providing visual illustrations and explanations.
The second video, "Why is it Dark at Night?" discusses the scientific underpinnings of why we experience darkness at night despite the vast number of stars in the universe.