Chapter 1: The Irony of Conversations

Recently, after sharing an article, I received feedback from several individuals who expressed confusion regarding the main point I was attempting to convey. There’s a certain irony in that. In response, I’ve decided to create a follow-up that provides various examples to clarify my position. Some of these examples may resonate differently with different people. It's important to note that I’m merely showcasing random, yet genuine instances from Part 1. Not all of these reflect my personal beliefs. I sometimes flip conversations around to obscure my own views, leading to greater confusion.

Over the years, engaging in conversations with others has been enlightening. Occasionally, I find myself politely challenging their opinions, offering alternative viewpoints to observe their reactions. My aim is to highlight the ironies and contradictions that arise when individuals follow beliefs without critical thought. Here are some conversations I've had that illustrate this point. Whether an opinion is deemed right or wrong isn’t for me to determine. You might hold a correct perspective, but is it genuinely yours, or simply what you’ve been told? Feel free to share your critiques; they only serve to reinforce my argument.

“What do you think about the vaccine?”

“We’ve been told to get vaccinated for our own benefit. If you choose not to, you’re just being ignorant.”

“Is that because the government recommended it?”

“Yes.”

“Do women have autonomy over their own bodies?”

“Absolutely, if a woman decides to have an abortion, it's her choice. No man should dictate what she does with her body.”

“What are your thoughts on transgender issues?”

“It’s fantastic that individuals can express themselves freely.”

“Some communities assert that men can become pregnant. What’s your take on that?”

“I think it’s great that science is challenging our understanding.”

“What if a man wants to have an abortion? Does he have that right?”

“Well, yes, of course.”

“But you mentioned it’s a woman’s decision.”

“It is.”

“Then are you suggesting he doesn’t have the right to that choice?”

“That’s not what I mean.”

“Please clarify.”

“A man cannot dictate what a woman does with her body. If he transitions and becomes a woman, then she has the right to choose.”

“So, let me get this straight. Only a woman has the authority over her body, yet some advocate for others to take substances. Men can become pregnant but lack a say in abortion unless they transition. Am I following your logic?”

“No!”

“Let’s shift topics. How do you feel about gun control?”

“I support it. We need to eliminate guns; they only cause harm.”

“What about law enforcement and the military? Shouldn’t they have firearms?”

“They need them for our protection.”

“So, ordinary citizens don’t require weapons?”

“No.”

“Some argue that if guns are banned, only criminals will have them, as they don’t follow laws. What’s your opinion on the police?”

“They should be defunded.”

“What if a criminal breaks into your home?”

“I’d call the police.”

“But they’ve been defunded, lacking the resources to assist you. Also, without firearms, how can you defend yourself from someone stronger?”

“Well, that’s never going to happen to me.”

“Why’s that?”

“Because I’m ready for anything.”

“Let’s change the subject.”

“Do you think men and women should have equal rights in all areas?”

“Yes.”

“Does this imply men should participate in women’s sports?”

“No, that’s not fair.”

“If a man transitions, doesn’t that make him a woman?”

“Yes, definitely.”

“Then shouldn’t she be allowed to compete in women's sports?”

“Well, no. They would still have a natural advantage in size and strength.”

“But you acknowledge they’re a woman.”

“Yes, but it’s different.”

“Does that mean they aren’t a woman in the same sense?”

“No, they’re a woman.”

“Only in a different way?”

“No.”

“So, can they compete in women’s sports?”

“Yes, but no?”

“Let’s move on. Do you advocate for gay rights?”

“Yes.”

“Do you support the war in Ukraine?”

“Yes.”

“Ukraine has a strong anti-gay stance. Is it acceptable to support a nation that opposes your beliefs?”

“Well, yes. There are still people there.”

“Even if they reject what you hold dear?”

“Yes.”

“If someone tells you abortion is illegal, would you still back them?”

“No, certainly not.”

“Yet they’re simply trying to preserve lives from their perspective.”

“My body, my choice.”

“What’s your view on Metric versus Standard measurements?”

“Standard is the better option.”

“Why do you think that?”

“Because I’ve always used it.”

“That makes it superior?”

“Yes, I guess.”

“The majority of the world utilizes the metric system, which is based on tens rather than fractions, making it simpler to learn.”

“That’s what we use in the U.S.”

“What do you prefer, lines or circles?”

“Definitely circles.”

“You can’t form circles without lines to start with.”

“That’s irrelevant; circles are better.”

“Lines form the foundation for all shapes. Why do you think they’re inferior?”

“Because that’s what the media told me.”

I’ll wrap it up here; those examples are sufficient. I’m not asserting which answer is correct. I’m merely shedding light on the nature of ignorance. I’ve explored this concept in various articles previously. Ultimately, it’s up to you to determine what you believe is right and wrong. Don’t arrive at conclusions simply because you’ve been told. Question everything. I hope this contributes to slowing the spread of ignorance. Thank you for reading.

Chapter 2: Examining the Absurd

In this video titled "People Doing Stupid Things - Part 2," viewers are shown various real-life examples of absurd behaviors that illustrate the theme of ignorance in society.

The next video, "People Doing Stupid Things - Part 3," continues this exploration, providing further examples that highlight the often ridiculous nature of human decision-making.