Can Tesla Truly Sell Cars Without Making a Profit?
Written on
Understanding Tesla's Profitability Model
Elon Musk has long been known for his bold assertions and ambitious plans, but his recent claim during a Q1 earnings call has raised eyebrows. He suggested that Tesla could sell vehicles at zero profit while still remaining a sustainable business. Is this merely a tactic to deter competitors in the ongoing electric vehicle (EV) price war? Or is there a deeper strategy at play?
In recent years, Tesla has boasted impressive profit margins of around 20% on its electric vehicles. However, competitors like BYD, Polestar, Kia, Hyundai, and Volkswagen have significantly narrowed the gap, and in some cases, overtaken Tesla in sales. Additionally, the global cost of living crisis, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions, has led to a decline in demand for EVs, impacting Tesla's revenue targets, which are crucial for maintaining its high stock price.
To counter this drop in demand, Tesla has enacted substantial price reductions (read more here). The premise was that selling more vehicles at a lower margin would compensate for the reduced profit per unit. However, this strategy backfired as competitors also lowered their prices, resulting in a stagnant demand for Tesla vehicles, giving rise to what is being called the EV price war.
Despite these challenges, Tesla narrowly missed its Q1 earnings target in 2023. Some analysts interpret this as a sign of declining momentum for Tesla, suggesting that Musk's dominance in the EV market may not last as long as anticipated. To reassure investors, Musk stated, “Tesla is in a uniquely strong strategic position because we’re the only ones making cars that technically we could sell for zero profit for now and then yield actually tremendous economics in the future through autonomy. No one else can do that.” He emphasized the importance of this assertion, noting its potential significance.
In essence, Musk's idea is that Tesla could sell cars at cost and profit from its autonomous driving software, either through one-time payments or subscription models. This approach could allow Tesla to undercut its rivals while remaining financially viable, potentially leading the EV market once more.
However, this proposition hinges on Tesla's ability to deliver fully autonomous vehicles. So, can they do that? The short answer is no. Here’s why.
Tesla is currently facing scrutiny from the Department of Justice regarding its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software (read more here). Musk has often promoted FSD as a nearly complete autonomous solution, but the DoJ views this as misleading, leading to misuse and some tragic accidents. This ongoing investigation could hinder Tesla's ability to legally offer genuine hands-free driving, presenting a significant hurdle in their quest for autonomy.
Moreover, Tesla's FSD has not met the expectations set by Musk. A few years ago, he predicted that fleets of fully autonomous Teslas would be on the road by now, yet this has not materialized. In fact, many of Tesla's competitors have made significant strides in autonomous technology.
The primary issue lies in Musk's decision to implement a camera-only self-driving system, contrary to the advice of his engineers (read more here). Experts largely agree that a comprehensive suite of sensors—such as lidar, 4D radar, ultrasound, and surround cameras—is essential for a vehicle to navigate its environment effectively. Tesla's vision-only system attempts to reconstruct a 3D model from video data, which is computationally intensive and often less reliable. Furthermore, environmental factors like lighting and weather can impair the cameras, impacting the system's performance.
While Tesla’s FSD works well under optimal conditions, it does not meet the legal criteria for Level 3 autonomous systems, which would permit fully automated driving. Currently, Tesla operates at Level 2, which is not considered autonomous. Meanwhile, competitors like Audi, Mercedes, Ford, GM, and Waymo have achieved Level 3 and even Level 4 autonomy (read more here).
If Musk had heeded the advice of his engineering team, Tesla might be leading the charge in autonomous technology.
The Feasibility of Selling Cars at Zero Profit
Could Tesla successfully sell vehicles without profit? If their FSD were on par with those from Mercedes, Audi, Ford, GM, and Waymo, it seems plausible. The idea of consumers paying significant monthly fees for hands-free driving in their Teslas is not far-fetched.
However, their current system is lacking. Even if Tesla began integrating additional sensors today—which would increase production costs and potentially reduce demand—they would still face the challenge of developing reliable AI systems. Optimizing AI for safe driving is a long-term endeavor, and Tesla may not have the luxury of time. Additionally, if the company were to switch to a new sensor-based system, existing Tesla owners might find their vehicles incompatible, leading to costly retrofits or potential legal issues.
Despite these challenges, Tesla's substantial cash reserves of around $16 billion and ongoing profitability suggest that it can endure this challenging period. However, Musk's claim that Tesla could sell cars at cost should be approached with skepticism; one should consider the broader implications and realities of the situation. Tesla's valuation relies on its revenues and perceived advantages in self-driving technology, both of which seem to be facing erosion, potentially jeopardizing the company's future.
Ultimately, Musk's statement might be less about a legitimate business strategy and more about managing public perception to keep Tesla in a leading position.
Chapter 2: Implications of the EV Price War
This video examines Tesla's profitability in comparison to BYD and its impact on the EV market dynamics.
This video discusses the recent decline in Tesla sales and the factors contributing to the ongoing price drops.