The Shift from UFO to UAP: A Historical Perspective
Written on
In the realm of unidentified aerial phenomena, the terminology has evolved significantly. The study of UFOs has been ongoing since at least the 1930s, which is well-documented. J. Allen Hynek, during a news segment, noted that the Russian Academy of Science rebranded UFOs as Observations of Anomalous Atmospheric Phenomena in the 1970s. The term Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, or UAP, is not a recent invention. This realization lends more credence to Rennenkampf’s article in The Hill questioning whether China and Russia have surpassed the U.S. in UFO retrieval and research, as they have been engaged in this investigation for decades.
UFOs are indeed real, and evidence shows that various nations, including the U.S., have been examining UAP long before the 2017 revelations. Critics of David Grusch's claims often overlook the extensive information that is readily available online. It is reasonable to assume that leading intelligence analysts have access to data that the general public does not.
Prominent figures in the UFO discourse, such as David Grusch, Haim Eshed, Robert Bigelow, and Bob Lazar, continue to affirm facts that have been known since the late 1970s. The pressing question remains: when will the truth finally be disclosed?
Who Holds the Authority?
Is it possible that extraterrestrials are the ones in control? If they possess advanced technology, one might hope they could provide better leadership. A diagram suggests that MJ12 operates under the president's authority, yet many presidents appear uninformed about UFO matters, raising questions about the accuracy of this hierarchy.
The U.S. has certainly been involved in UFO studies. It is plausible that the terminology was altered early on to allow officials to deny possessing UFO reports, while they were in fact analyzing alien spacecraft. It’s conceivable that they are aware of the specifications and classifications of these crafts, yet will claim ignorance.
EYE ON CINEMA has produced some compelling content that tends to disappear. I recommend watching the linked videos. While not urgent, the slow evolution of the alien narrative is a fascinating aspect of this story.
Contrary to recent articles suggesting that UFO enthusiasts are merely seeking fame and fortune, this subject deserves attention because it is rooted in reality. Reports indicate that we are encountering multiple alien species, yet those who have shared these experiences rarely achieve wealth or notoriety. It is notable that while some scientists and journalists are recognized within UFO circles, the field remains largely marginalized, and skeptics often seek recognition by denying the evidence.
This narrative warrants wider acknowledgment; it should dominate headlines rather than being relegated to opinion pieces. Genuine research into this phenomenon is needed, as there is currently no comprehensive history of UFOs. Until this subject gains mainstream acceptance, UFOlogists will continue correcting journalists who fail to conduct thorough research.
The topic of UFOs merits academic exploration. If one can obtain a PhD in religious studies or sociology, why not in the study of UFOs? The societal impact of this phenomenon is significant enough to warrant academic inquiry.
Some aspects of this subject are unsettling, particularly when they convey a distinctly non-human quality, despite being relatable through human experiences.
If 'Falcon' is accurate, who wouldn’t appreciate aliens that enjoy strawberry ice cream?
The U.S. Government's Alien Craft Acquisition
The assertion that the U.S. possesses alien spacecraft should be front-page news. A senior intelligence official revealed that they have breached the hull of such a craft and have been inside it, alongside military personnel. Why hasn’t this individual appeared before Congress to testify?
This question highlights barriers to bringing credible witnesses to congressional hearings. The extensive redaction of UFO-related documents has long been an issue. The secrecy surrounding this topic is precisely why the alien narrative persists. For skeptics seeking to understand why this discussion is gaining traction, the answer lies in government secrecy rather than the actions of UFOlogists.
UFOlogists have received heavily redacted documents, while David Grusch has accessed unredacted versions and interviewed the authors, arriving at conclusions that parallel those of firsthand experiencers.
The majority of UFOlogists are not trying to validate the existence of these phenomena; they are focused on demonstrating that the government acknowledges their reality and has been researching them since at least the 1940s. Despite the 2017 New York Times article suggesting a renewed interest since the 1980s, the truth is that the study of UFOs has never ceased.
Last week, a former senior Defense Intelligence Agency scientist became the tenth ex-official to publicly allege that the U.S. government has recovered at least one UFO.
Why haven’t prominent scientists like Neil DeGrasse Tyson or Avi Loeb examined this alleged alien craft? Where are the NASA UFO researchers or other mainstream scientists? Surely military personnel document such historic events.
While I wouldn't invite Tyson purely for the spectacle of his reaction after years of skepticism towards experiencers, it raises interesting questions.
Additionally, sources indicate that at least 30 whistleblowers familiar with UFO recovery efforts have provided testimony to Congress and relevant oversight bodies.
I am curious to know which members of Congress received this testimony. Tim Burchette has claimed he was left uninformed during a relevant SCIF session. Much of Rennenkampf’s subsequent discussion seems to revisit familiar territory. Notably, the rapid pace of UFO news means that within six months, it can feel outdated. I appreciated the question raised by Rennenkampf:
Are numerous high-ranking officials delusional, or are they genuinely sharing firsthand accounts of UFO knowledge?
This leads me to ponder whether Rennenkampf has been paying attention to current news cycles. Does the world seem increasingly chaotic? It’s not just the wars and rampant crime; people everywhere are making extraordinary claims that defy logic.
If this is a mental health contagion, it appears to be a global epidemic, impacting far beyond the realm of UFOs. As someone in mental health, it's worth noting that a common sign of such conditions is the belief that satellites are tracking individuals, or that technology can communicate with them telepathically. There’s a reason behind the 'tinfoil hat' stereotype.
Yet, counter to that, there are technologies capable of reading thoughts, and governments have historically targeted intelligence agents with advanced psychological tactics. The U.S. developed a psychic spy program in response to similar efforts by the Russians, and the Chinese followed suit.
Is the world truly losing its sanity, or is this simply the new reality? Perhaps the need for a little madness is essential, just enough for people to accept the notion that extraterrestrial life is indeed real.
recommended:
EarEEG - Earbuds that read your mind
Rikky Muller, Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, has refined the physical comfort of…
vcresearch.berkeley.edu
'Havana Syndrome' Not Caused by Energy Weapon or Foreign Agent, Report Says
Havana Syndrome is not the result of a hostile attack, a new government report finds.
www.psychiatrist.com
PLA 'pursued 16-year psychic spy operation'
China's military ran an 'X-files'-type research programme for 16 years, trying to use psychics for intelligence…
www.scmp.com
'Technology surprise': Are China, Russia ahead of us in UFO retrieval, research?
Following reporting that China and Russia may also have retrieved UFOs, it is noteworthy that the legislation alludes…
thehill.com