Keeping Pace with Academic Literature: A Practical Guide
Written on
Keeping up with academic literature can feel overwhelming, akin to trying to drink from a fire hydrant. With over 2.5 million papers published annually and an increasing pace of 8% each year, it’s no wonder that many find it challenging to stay afloat.
Surprisingly, mastering the art of literature review isn’t something that is explicitly taught. Instead, we are often left to figure it out on our own. However, I have discovered that while everyone has their own methods for locating and reading papers, there are a number of effective practices that are commonly recognized yet not universally known. This realization dawned on me during a lecture by Andrew Ng, where I learned valuable techniques for managing academic literature.
In this article, I will share insights from my experiences, as well as lessons learned from colleagues and professors. By the end, you will understand:
- How to identify papers relevant to your interests.
- How to read those papers efficiently using the three-pass method.
- Why maintaining a consistent reading habit is more beneficial than sporadic bursts of activity.
What Should You Read? A Selective Approach
Before diving into efficient reading, a key strategy for keeping up with academic literature is to narrow your focus and select what to read judiciously. Unless you possess a wide-ranging expertise like Da Vinci, your area of interest can likely be encapsulated in 6 to 10 specific keywords. As an Earth Scientist, I might use terms like “wildfire” or “forest mortality.”
Feel free to define your own set of keywords, but ensure they are specific. For instance, “deep learning” is too broad and will yield thousands of unrelated papers, making it difficult to find what is pertinent. In contrast, “image segmentation” is a well-defined term that will lead to more relevant results. Additionally, don't hesitate to update your keywords as your interests evolve.
After determining your keywords, utilize the following resources to compile literature that aligns with your interests:
- Online Searches: Use platforms like Google Scholar (free), Scopus (paid), or Web of Science (paid). While useful for one-off searches, these tools should not be your sole method for staying updated.
- Conference Proceedings.
- Twitter: Search for influential figures in your field using your keywords.
- Network: Collaborate with friends and colleagues to discover relevant papers; reciprocate by sharing findings from your area.
- Google Scholar Alerts: Set alerts using your keywords or follow researchers whose work intrigues you.
- Table of Contents Alerts: Subscribe to receive alerts from journals that frequently publish articles in your field. JournalTOCs is a valuable service that consolidates alerts from various journals. While opinions vary on the necessity of reviewing table of contents, I find it beneficial for staying informed about broader scientific advancements.
Once you’ve curated a list of relevant papers, you can employ the three-pass approach for reading them effectively.
How to Read: The Three-Pass Method Explained
When reviewing papers, it’s essential to thoroughly examine significant ones while skimming others. Since it’s impossible to determine a paper's importance beforehand, reading everything in its entirety is not the best use of time, as relevance can vary widely. Some papers may be crucial for their background information, while others may present analyses worth replicating or conflicting results that demand close scrutiny.
Rather than sequentially reading each paper, I recommend the three-pass approach (developed by S. Keshav), which allows for the identification of key papers and focuses on relevant sections. This method involves multiple readings, each one delving deeper into the content.
Round 1: The Highlights.
The first round involves reviewing the title, abstract, and figures with captions, enabling you to grasp the paper’s main conclusions without delving into specifics. The goal is to understand the “what” rather than the “why” or “how” at this stage. I recommend covering every paper from your curated list in this round.
Consider the following questions during Round 1: 1. What objectives did the authors aim to achieve? 2. How might the figures be enhanced? (This is a useful skill to develop, regardless of content.)
At the conclusion of Round 1, filter out papers that are clearly irrelevant to your interests, then proceed to Round 2.
Round 2: The Core.
In Round 2, read the introduction, results, conclusions, and figures with captions while skimming the rest. This round is where comprehension deepens, as the introduction clarifies the research's necessity, and the results and conclusions elucidate the findings.
Keep these prompts in mind during Round 2: 1. What ideas or data can be applied to your work? 2. Which references warrant further exploration?
Round 3: The Details.
In Round 3, focus on the methods, discussion, and relevant references, while skimming other sections. This round is dedicated to in-depth understanding. By examining the methods closely, you should feel equipped to replicate the study. This round should only include papers that are directly pertinent to your interests.
After completing multiple rounds, take note of frequently cited papers within your initial set. The emphasis on the discussion section in Round 3 will also guide you to other relevant studies with similar findings or critical insights.
Using the three-pass method, I can review approximately 25 papers weekly without dedicating excessive time to those less relevant to my current focus. This technique is effective only when practiced regularly.
When to Read? Every Day!
If you take away only one point from this article, let it be this: Consistency in reading is far more effective than sporadic efforts. Literature reviews are essential not just at the start of a project, but must be integrated into your routine to avoid becoming outdated. This is particularly true in rapidly evolving fields like deep learning, where papers from just a few years ago may already be considered obsolete.
Lack of consistent reading is risky for two main reasons: 1. After the initial literature review, you may no longer be aware of the latest developments in your field. 2. You run the risk of overlooking important papers that weren't included in your initial review.
I learned this lesson the hard way during a conference when someone questioned my assumptions based on a paper I had not read. Since then, I have committed to reading at least one paper each night, which has significantly improved my ability to keep up with the literature.
A paper a day keeps embarrassment at bay.
Conclusion
In this article, we explored effective strategies for staying current with academic literature. While online searches can be helpful, utilizing tools like scholar alerts or table of contents notifications is essential for regular updates. With a well-curated list of papers, you can then employ the three-pass approach to read efficiently—first capturing the highlights, then delving into the core content, and finally, understanding the intricate details. After each round, feel free to discard papers that do not relate to your interests. Lastly, I hope my own embarrassing experience underscores the importance of daily reading, emphasizing that literature review should not be relegated to a one-time task.