# The Future of Journalism: Are We Ready to Move On?
Written on
The Evolution of Media
In a world increasingly comfortable without traditional iPhone connectors, we may also be bracing for a future without journalism—regardless of what Bon Jovi might have to say about it.
This paragraph will result in an indented block of text, typically used for quoting other text.
The question arises: is Apple simply ahead of the curve in eliminating “unnecessary” features, or is it merely convincing us that these features are redundant? Looking back, we can remember the floppy disk drives, CD drives, USB-A ports on Macs, headphone jacks, Touch ID, and Lightning ports on iPhones. You might wonder about the charging port—yes, it’s likely that the next iPhone will phase it out entirely. As noted in a CNN article, Apple has a track record of removing technologies just before consumers feel ready to part with them.
It’s crucial to understand that the emphasis here is not on “removal” but rather on acting “before consumers are ready.” Over the years, Apple has consistently replaced features before complaints arise, anticipating needs before they manifest. This approach is not mere trial-and-error; it is a calculated strategy akin to chess, which involves predicting numerous future moves. Ultimately, it revolves around recognizing and fulfilling consumer desires—sometimes even those they aren’t consciously aware of.
The Changing Landscape of Journalism
Throughout my experiences as a public speaker—addressing audiences from 13 to 1,300—I have often been asked whether print media is on the verge of extinction. To be candid, the answer seems obvious: yes, it will eventually fade away. Yet, there’s an underlying sense of curiosity in the question: “Really? When will this happen?” If print media were an Apple product, I’d argue that it was effectively retired back in 1999.
Recently, I’ve pondered a more provocative question: what about journalism as a whole? If all forms of journalism—print, digital, television, and radio—were to be discontinued in 2021, would society rise up in protest? This isn't just a rhetorical inquiry. Would people genuinely miss journalism, or would they be satisfied with just crossword puzzles, cooking tips, memes, and quizzes?
The Role of Journalism in Modern Society
The immediate response from many might be disbelief: how could one even entertain such a notion? After all, 2020 was a demanding year, and journalism proved to be as vital as ever. Even Jon Bon Jovi, at 59, started engaging with the news during the pandemic, reflecting on how the world had slowed down, allowing him to take time to read and understand current events.
If even a rock star like Bon Jovi has taken an interest in the news, how could I possibly malign journalism? Let’s refine the question: will “some” forms of journalism face extinction soon, and if so, will anyone care? I personally miss the headphone jack and, in a similar vein, I yearn for quality journalism. However, I doubt that the current generation in their twenties will feel nostalgic about it later.
The question of journalism's potential demise is not a frivolous one; it’s about deciphering consumer desires—particularly those that remain unspoken. There are fewer news outlets and professionals today than there were two decades ago. Additionally, many of us have been living without certain forms of journalism long before the pandemic struck. It’s also apparent that the quality of headlines has diminished, stories lack depth, and the art of storytelling has suffered greatly. The presentation of journalistic content seems outdated, as if the technological advancements of the past 25 years have only made the stagnation more pronounced.
A Shift in Consumer Expectations
Will print media vanish? Absolutely, it should have been phased out long ago. Among various media types, newspapers and magazines have been the least adept at transitioning from the analog era. Will journalism, in its entirety, cease to exist? I sincerely hope not, but the possibility cannot be dismissed—especially given the circumstances of 2020, which saw even Bon Jovi become more attuned to current events.
When Apple removes features “before people are ready to give them up,” it’s not merely depriving users; it’s introducing alternatives that it believes will offer greater value. While this strategy doesn’t guarantee success every time, it certainly keeps Apple relevant and disruptively innovative.
Conversely, journalism has often replaced its valuable features with less effective ones. Terms like clickbait, memes, and superficial commentary have taken center stage, offering little substance. This raises the question of how effectively journalism can translate and fulfill consumer desires, a challenge that might backfire in the long run.
Moreover, when news organizations fail to present journalism as a premium offering, they inadvertently pave the way for dubious “alternative sources” filled with clickbait and shallow content. Who else is responsible when consumers gravitate towards these inferior options?
In a strange twist, both Apple and media companies operate under similar principles, but in reverse directions: they have removed certain “technologies” before consumers are prepared to let them go. The troubling aspect of journalism's approach is that it may lead people to abandon it entirely.
Exploring Repair Solutions for Headphone Jacks
One of the prevalent issues facing technology users today is the malfunctioning headphone jack.
The first video titled "How to FIX Headphone Jack On Xbox One Controller Without Opening (Easy Method!)" provides an easy solution to fix headphone jack issues without the need for complex repairs.
Similarly, the video "How To Repair Scratchy Noisy Headphone Jack - YouTube" offers valuable insights on addressing and fixing scratchy and noisy headphone jack problems, emphasizing the importance of maintaining audio quality.
In conclusion, as we navigate the evolving landscape of journalism, we must remain vigilant about our media consumption choices and advocate for the quality we deserve.