<How to Engage Climate Change Deniers in Meaningful Dialogue>
Written on
The digital age has polarized individuals regarding their long-term interests. This is evident among various groups:
- Young women whose self-worth hinges on social media validation.
- Men who favor adult content over genuine relationships.
- Youngsters engrossed in gaming rather than contributing to society.
- Generally healthy individuals who oppose vaccinations.
- Ordinary citizens who have become fervent political extremists.
A particularly concerning trend is the rise of millions convinced by algorithms on platforms like Facebook that climate change is fabricated.
It seems that every family has at least one member who dismisses human-caused climate change, often citing studies funded by controversial interests. Alarmingly, they also deny any possibility of humanity harming the planet.
Here are some strategies to effectively communicate with individuals holding such beliefs.
Avoid Online Confrontations
Recently, I was accused on Twitter of inciting violence.
My measured response didn’t prevent the individual from bombarding me with further falsehoods.
So, I attempted to move the conversation offline:
Why offline?
Most people wouldn’t express such hostility face-to-face. In a personal setting, we could engage in meaningful dialogue and perhaps find common ground.
Create a Comfortable Environment
While joking about getting someone inebriated, the point remains: foster a relaxed atmosphere. Share a meal, take a leisurely stroll discussing light topics, and then settle in with tea and cookies.
This safe environment can help them feel secure before tackling more challenging discussions.
Clarify Your Intentions
Be transparent about your objectives:
> "I understand you hold strong views about climate change being a myth, but as [family/friends/colleagues], I’d appreciate five minutes to share my viewpoint. You don’t need to agree, just listen so I feel acknowledged."
Most people will be receptive to this request. If they aren’t, it may be wise to reassess the relationship.
Reframe the Discussion
Terms like "global warming" can be confusing and trigger defensive responses. Instead, simplify the dialogue by discussing "air pollution."
While some may reject the concept of climate change, few can deny the existence of pollution.
Once you establish this common ground, you can expand the conversation.
Illustrate the Mechanism of Global Warming
To explain air pollution's effects, share this analogy or conduct a simple experiment:
- Visualize a sealed fish tank or a glass terrarium filled with oxygen.
- Imagine a heat lamp illuminating the enclosure. While some heat escapes, the overall temperature increases.
- Now, instead of oxygen, introduce gases like nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, and CFCs. These gases trap heat, leading to increased temperatures—a phenomenon known as the greenhouse effect. (If accessible, demonstrate this in a sauna by pouring water on hot stones to create steam.)
- Recognize that Earth functions like this greenhouse. Overloading our atmosphere with heat-retaining gases can yield both beneficial effects (like extended growing seasons) and dire consequences (such as extreme weather and rising sea levels).
Pose this question: Could humans potentially generate enough pollution to outweigh these benefits?
Listen attentively. Your aim is to plant a seed of doubt about the impossibility of global warming.
If your listener expresses skepticism about human impact, acknowledge their viewpoint and gently offer your insights.
Highlight Earth's Size
Traveling extensively has shown me that our planet is surprisingly small.
Consider these facts:
- The Earth spans only 123 billion acres, with fewer than 37 billion above water.
- One-third of the land is desert, and about 24% is mountainous.
- Merely 10.6% is arable.
- Approximately 7.91 billion people inhabit the planet.
Ask your friend if it’s conceivable that human actions could devastate their small plot of land. I believe I could inflict significant damage in a short time.
Now, consider the broader implications of industrial activities and how our consumer habits could similarly harm the planet.
Discuss Human Impact
After establishing the planet's size and the potential for human pollution, discuss current human impacts on nature:
- Urban development
- Agricultural areas
- Grazing lands
- Energy production
- Mining operations
- Transportation infrastructure
Utilize technology to visually represent our environmental footprint and prompt them to consider the future implications of a growing population and pollution levels.
If they suggest technology will provide solutions, remind them that this acknowledgment indicates awareness of an existing problem.
Listen and Empathize
Thank them for listening and acknowledge that discussing these topics can be challenging.
Encourage them to share their thoughts on your perspective and understand their fears surrounding climate change denial.
Recognize that discussions about the environment often intertwine with issues of power and politics.
Shift Your Focus
Remember, your goal isn’t to change their mind outright. Reflect on how often you’ve been swayed from a firmly held belief.
This calls for patience, empathy, and healthy dialogue.
Instead of striving to win an argument, aim to cultivate a friendship. Plant ideas and thoughts that may lead to change down the line.
Ultimately, nature will assert its influence, regardless of beliefs regarding climate change, and we must navigate these challenges together.
Follow Jared on Medium + Join thousands who enjoy unlimited access to his articles and podcasts.